Every pause starts with one small step. The step can be backwards or sideways.
But this can be due to a multitude of factors.
The pause is confirmed when a second reading is also sideways or backward.
Mind you it is a very temporary pause and of very little import.
Further readings can be up or down and still be a pause as long as the average of the readings from the first step remain at or below the last reading that was he start of the pause.
Now comes the interesting part. Defining a pause as the length of time from the initial start point would give a decline instead of a pause if the readings over time continue downwards
A pause is actually a leveling of the readings, which dates from the last reading backwards.
Hence after say 20 readings downwards one has to take extra readings from the upwards part of the graph to balance out or level the new downwards section. The way to do this is to take the line across from the last reading to the new first reading, then evaluate the area above the line and take the average level here as the length of the pause.
Obviously the start of the pause is not where the line goes across from the last reading but a little higher,
The point is though that the pause extends backwards as well as forwards as long as the last measurement puts the average below the initial measurement when the pause started.
When the average starts dropping significantly the pause extends out dramatically.
When does a pause become a reversal or fall?
1929 is a good answer. A fall or reversal starts with a similar change to a pause only it is never a sideways step always down.
The only answer can be in retrospect although a good sign is a preternaturally large fall. The global climate changes constantly and a big fall is only likely through a catastrophic event which mankind cannot ward against.
when it thaws out, that is.
AGW could exist if Human beings produced enough energy or CO2
to increase the thermal load in the earths atmosphere. Alternative methods could also work e.g. painting/coating the earth’s surface black to absorb heat [or white if one wanted AG Cooling.]. The amount of heat coming in [and leaving the earth each day is on orders of magnitude so vastly different that human heat output is negligible and always will be.
Steve Mosher believes that CO2 increase of itself must scientifically lead to warming [AGW]. and technically he is right except…
one, there is no step by step link to show this is happening. The CO2 goes up but the temperature goes up down and sideways and never in kilter with the CO2 rise.Obviously there are “natural variations” but there is no link and he knows this.
secondly there may be confounding reasons that lead to greater outgoing radiation when the CO2 levels go up. The extra heat retention may cause more cloud, thinner atmosphere. more reflectiveness of the atmosphere whatever that counter balances the pure physics of CO2 alone.
If such forces exist [a little more likely than the deep heat in the oceans rubbish] He should be prepared to be more skeptical than he currently allows himself to be.
PS better to drag the oceans than beat the bushes to find AGW believer’s at the moment Steve
I opened the fridge and found a frozen Schrodinger’s cat. At the same time I note a giant leap upwards on the arctic sea ice extent.[Ice Area NORSEX SSM/I August 1st 2013]
The world has just done a quantum leap sideways in space in the last few days and both the Arctic and Antarctic are getting less sun.
At least it makes more sense than more heat deciding to go missing in the deep sea.
PS will write further if the cat is alive or dead